A designed resume does not get your application rejected by a machine. What it does is quieter and more common: it makes your experience harder to read for both the software that files it and the person who skims it, so the good parts of your history land with less force than they should.
The fix is not an ugly document. It is a document whose structure lives in its text rather than in its picture.
The answer, before the reasoning
Use one column. Put every word in the body of the document, not in text boxes, tables, headers or footers. Write your dates as text beside the role they belong to. Keep icons and graphics out of anything that carries information, and let the words carry it instead. Send a PDF you exported from a word processor, not one exported from a design tool.
Everything below is why, and what to do if your current resume breaks those rules.
What actually goes wrong when your resume is parsed
Every system that handles your resume starts by pulling the text out of it. Layout is not part of what it pulls. A two-column design looks like two neat panels to you and like one long list of lines to the software, and those lines come out in the order the file happens to store them.
What you designed
SKILLS
Python
SQL
Leadership
CONTACT
0400 000 000
EXPERIENCE
Data Manager
Acme, 2021 - Present
Built the reporting stack
What the software reads
SKILLS
EXPERIENCE
Python
Data Manager
SQL
Acme, 2021 - Present
Leadership
Built the reporting stack
CONTACT
0400 000 000
Nothing was rejected there and nothing was deleted. The document simply stopped saying what you wrote: a job title sitting between two skills, and dates three lines from the role they describe. If a recruiter later searches that database for people who did a particular job in the last two years, this resume answers the question badly through no fault of the person who wrote it.
The same is true of the other design habits, for the same reason:
- Headers and footers. Genuinely the worst offender, because it is where people put their phone number and email. Many extractors skip that region entirely, so the one part of the document that has to survive is the part most likely not to.
- Tables. A two-cell row reads as two separate lines, in an order you did not choose. Skills laid out in a neat grid come out as a jumble.
- Text boxes. Floating boxes are stored separately from the body text, so they arrive somewhere unpredictable, often at the very end.
- Icons instead of labels. A small envelope glyph next to an address is a picture. To the software the label is missing, and to a screen reader it is missing too.
- Skill ratings as bars or stars. Four filled circles out of five is not a claim anything can read. It is also not a claim anyone believes, which is a separate problem.
The part the design advice gets right
It is worth being fair to the other side, because the usual version of this article is not. A designed resume is often genuinely easier for a human to skim: clear headings, real whitespace and a consistent hierarchy do help, and SEEK’s own guidance on what a great resume looks like is about structure and clarity rather than decoration.
The distinction that matters is between typography and geometry. Bold headings, generous spacing, a readable size and a consistent order are typography, they survive extraction intact, and they are worth having. Columns, tables, boxes and overlapping graphics are geometry, and geometry is the thing that does not survive. You can have a handsome document without any of the second category.
Is this an Australian problem specifically?
The parsing part is universal. What is local is where your resume ends up. Australian hiring runs heavily through a handful of systems: SEEK for much of the private market, PageUp and Workday across universities, large enterprises and health, and the APS departments running their own recruitment portals. Workday’s own description of what an applicant tracking system does is worth two minutes: it is a database with a search box, not a judge.
That matters for this article, because a database with a search box is exactly the thing a broken layout hurts. Greenhouse, another system you will meet applying to Australian tech companies, publishes how recruiters search candidates: boolean queries over the text of your resume. If your job title was absorbed into a sidebar, you are not in those results.
The Australian specifics of the document itself, the ones that have nothing to do with layout, are covered in the Australian resume format guide.
How to fix a two-column resume you already have
You do not need to start again. In order of how much each is worth:
- Move your name, phone number and email out of the header and into the first lines of the body.
- Collapse any two-column section into one column. The sidebar is usually skills or contact details, and both read perfectly well as ordinary lines.
- Replace tables with plain paragraphs and lists. If you used a table purely for alignment, tabs or a list will do the same job.
- Put your dates on the same line as the role, in text. Not in a separate column, not in a graphic timeline.
- Export to PDF from Word, Google Docs or Pages. A PDF from a design tool is often a picture of a document rather than a document.
How to check if your resume parses cleanly, without any tool
Open your PDF, select all the text, copy it, and paste it into a blank document. What you see is roughly what every system downstream sees. If your phone number is missing, if your job titles have drifted away from their dates, or if the whole thing pastes as nothing at all, you have found the problem, and you found it before an employer did.
Pasting as nothing at all is the one worth knowing about: it means the file is an image, and no amount of good wording inside it will ever be read.
The honest caveat
Fixing your layout will not get you a job, and it will not turn a weak application into a strong one. What it does is stop a good application being read as a weaker one. That is a smaller claim than the usual version of this article makes, and it is the one we can stand behind.
It is also worth keeping the myth in proportion: no machine is scoring your personality or rejecting three quarters of applicants on sight. What really happens to your file after you press apply is covered in the guide on exactly that, and it is less dramatic and more useful than the story.